Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/9/20 10:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all >>> binNMUs >>> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all fil

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/11/20 3:27 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all >> binNMUs are done

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all > binNMUs > >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 11/9/20 6:34 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/9/20 10:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures > > Does anyone else than me think it's probably OK to just disable to 2 > broken tests? As long as it doesn't indicate something serious, it's pr

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/9/20 10:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures Does anyone else than me think it's probably OK to just disable to 2 broken tests? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed >> for >> all known problems [1], and the current

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed >> for >> all known problems [1], and the current

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-10-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs > are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed > for > all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen > at > [2

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-10-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs > are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed > for > all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen > at > [2