On 05.11.18 10:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.11.18 09:17, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
>>> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to re
> No one in Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
That is hardly surprising, most Debian/Ubuntu users will be using the default
python3 version.
IMO (I am just a random dd) if Debian is going to switch the default python
version for buster it should be done ASAP to maximize the amount of testing
wi
On 05.11.18 20:31, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in
>> Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
>
> I got one also in fabio:
> https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243
>
On Monday, November 05, 2018 08:31:56 PM Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
>
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one
> > in
> > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
>
> I got one also in fabio:
> https://github.com
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in
> Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
I got one also in fabio:
https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243
Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages (
On Monday, November 05, 2018 05:31:36 PM Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> > Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster?
>
> +1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7.
I recently got burned by changes in
Hi,
po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster?
>
+1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7.
Thanks.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573
On 11/5/18 9:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
> has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to
> open this thread.
>
>
On 05.11.18 09:17, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
>> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
>> has passed, RC bugs have bee
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
> has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to
> open this thr
10 matches
Mail list logo
