On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21:38AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/22/22 17:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > Or should we mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11 so they can stay in
> > > > testing as long as Python 3.10 is the default?
> > >
> > > I don't think this is the way.
> >
> > I'm
On 11/22/22 17:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Or should we mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11 so they can stay in
testing as long as Python 3.10 is the default?
I don't think this is the way.
I'm sorry, I don't understand - which is not the way?
I don't think you should "mark them as X-Pytho
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:01:03PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > If there are people with the expertise to help upstream update
> > bytecode and parso (and probably several other low-level packages) for
> > 3.11 so that the software that depends on them works with 3.11, then
> > fine. (And it i
On 11/22/22 10:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:22:05AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
this, 100 times
I very much don't agree. I think it's going pretty well, and the number of
breakage isn't high. We just need a little bit of effort to make it in good
enough shape.
[...]
Now
On Monday, November 21, 2022 12:25:05 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau"
wrote:
> >On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
> >> proceed. Certainly we are not
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:22:05AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > this, 100 times
>
> I very much don't agree. I think it's going pretty well, and the number of
> breakage isn't high. We just need a little bit of effort to make it in good
> enough shape.
> [...]
> Now, out of *many* of my packag
On 11/21/22 18:30, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:03 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default
Python ve
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:03 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
>
> On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
> > proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default
> > Python version!!
>
> This is a conce
On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau"
wrote:
>On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
>> proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default
>> Python version!!
>
>This is a co
On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
proceed. Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default
Python version!!
This is a concern I share and I think I've been pretty vocal about it.
I feel the state of pytho
10 matches
Mail list logo
