Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guido has recently checked in a license change that makes Python
> GPL compatible.
Here's the diff:
Index: LICENSE
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/LICENSE,v
retrieving rev
Carey Evans wrote:
> Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Excuse me for bugging you about this, but has you heard anything
> > from RMS yet? With the upcoming freeze, it would be nice to know as
> > soon as possible if we will have a GPL compatible python 2.x in
> > woody.
>
> Act
Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excuse me for bugging you about this, but has you heard anything
> from RMS yet? With the upcoming freeze, it would be nice to know as
> soon as possible if we will have a GPL compatible python 2.x in
> woody.
Actually, it'd be nice just to have Py
On 18 Apr 2001 13:10:44 +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Vasko Miroslav wrote:
> > as Python 2.1 is out, there is no need to keep Python2 and Python152
> > in Debian, I think.
> >
> > it looks like 2.1 has GPL-compatible license (it has, in fact, three
> >
At some point, D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:17:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> | Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | [Python warning messages]
> |
> | > Could you mail an example of such a message ?
> |
> | y = None
> | def fun():
> | y =
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:17:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| [Python warning messages]
|
| > Could you mail an example of such a message ?
|
| y = None
| def fun():
| y = None
| def bar():
| y
| bar()
|
| fun()
|
| result
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Python warning messages]
> Could you mail an example of such a message ?
y = None
def fun():
y = None
def bar():
y
bar()
fun()
results in:
:2: SyntaxWarning: local name 'y' in 'fun' shadows use of 'y' as global
in nested scope
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:04:24AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:25:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > | Steve Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > |
> > | > Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2
D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:25:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> | Steve Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2.1
> | > as with Python 2.0.
> |
> | Python 2.1 seems to print some diagno
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> last I checked it only helped derivatives of python, not python itself.
AIUI, the point is that Python 2.1 is a derivative of CNRI Python 1.6.1.
--
Carey Evans http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/
"Quiet, you'll miss
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:25:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| Steve Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2.1
| > as with Python 2.0.
|
| Python 2.1 seems to print some diagnostic messages during run-time;
| this might affec
Steve Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2.1
> as with Python 2.0.
Python 2.1 seems to print some diagnostic messages during run-time;
this might affect scripts which are invoked in cron jobs.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 18-Apr-2001 Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Vasko Miroslav wrote:
> >> as Python 2.1 is out, there is no need to keep Python2 and Python152
> >> in Debian, I think.
> >>
> >> it looks
On 18-Apr-2001 Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Vasko Miroslav wrote:
>> as Python 2.1 is out, there is no need to keep Python2 and Python152
>> in Debian, I think.
>>
>> it looks like 2.1 has GPL-compatible license (it has, in fact, three
>> licenses)
>
> Thank
Vasko Miroslav wrote:
> as Python 2.1 is out, there is no need to keep Python2 and Python152
> in Debian, I think.
> [snip]
> and code-breakage features like nested scopes are disabled by default.
Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2.1
as with Python 2.0.
The byte c
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Vasko Miroslav wrote:
> as Python 2.1 is out, there is no need to keep Python2 and Python152
> in Debian, I think.
>
> it looks like 2.1 has GPL-compatible license (it has, in fact, three
> licenses)
Thanks for pointing out the changes in LICENSE. Since t
16 matches
Mail list logo
