On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:08AM -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
| Debian newbie question, here. How does the progression of packages go
| within stable? Once 0.12.0 emerges, can the sources pick it up, or is
| it pretty much locked out of stable for all time?
stable packages don't progress, apart
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 06:49, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
>
> | I'd be a bit reluctant to work on patches now, given the short
> | delay, since it would be difficult for people to test the patches
> | properly before Woody goes out,
>
> Don't be too su
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 23:36, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> > able to figure out:
>
> ...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> > remove python-4suite-0.11.1 from woody and push hard to patch
> >
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
| I'd be a bit reluctant to work on patches now, given the short
| delay, since it would be difficult for people to test the patches
| properly before Woody goes out,
Don't be too sure of that. It was almost a year ago when we delayed
d
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:36:12AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> > able to figure out:
> > ...
>
> Thanks a lot.
Well, I have someinterst in this, if I am to act as a maint
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> able to figure out:
...
Thanks a lot.
> remove python-4suite-0.11.1 from woody and push hard to patch
> python-xml-0.7.1 to fix the xml.xslt bugs
I think this going to happ
I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
able to figure out:
On the debian package side:
- boot-floppies build-depends on python-xml
- python-4suite-0.11.1 works sort of ok with python-xml-0.6.8
- python-4suite-0.11.1 won't work with python-xml-0.7
-> the xml
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:26:48PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * There are no clashes between PyXML and 4Suite's xpath and xslt,
> > because they live in differant packates (xml and Ft.Xml)
>
> That is right if you consider 0.12aX versions of 4Suite,
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Then, I'll try to see if I can remove xslt and xpath from 4suite
>> 0.11 and ship the one in python-xml 0.7. This may "unbreak things"
>> (I don't really believe in that though).
>
> Hi,
>
> A few things that may be relevant here:
>
> * There are no
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:16:21PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>>
> >>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
> >>> an upload might be safe ...
> >>
> >> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Does this sound better?
>>
>
> definately. Although I am still confused about why I can not build the 4suite
Well, I've just realized that all links are in the Windows format, with
backslashes :/
On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
> of prerendered 4suite docs.
> I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
> happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
> to make the package conflict on the previous ve
Hi,
It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
of prerendered 4suite docs.
I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
to make the package conflict on the previous version
and avoid to render the documentation.
Doe
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
>> not a lot
>> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
>> ?
>> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
>> >>
>> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> >> an upload might be safe ...
>> >
>> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>> >
>>
>> consider people using it a
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
> >>
> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
> >> an upload might be safe ...
> >
> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
> >
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
with this arg
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>>> an upload might be safe ...
>>
>> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>>
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian
>>
>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> an upload might be safe ...
>
> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>
consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can also add:
>> Build-Conflicts: python2.1-4suite (<< 0.11.99), python2.2-4suite (<<
>> 0.11.99)
>>
>> But I don't like doing this.
>
> well, that's only a problem on _your_ machine :-) autobuilders don't
> have this package installed anyway
Jérôme Marant writes:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> > distutils yet to tackle it.
>
> I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
> know what can be done with distut
>
> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
> not a lot
> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
> ?
> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1 ?
>
damned if you do, damned if you don't. 0.12 uses a
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> distutils yet to tackle it.
I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
know what can be done with distutils (if ever it can be done with the
>>
>> 4suite is obviously updating the python search path to add its modules, the
>> modules should be added at the front of the list and not the end where they
>> seem to be added.
>
> This really sucks. I don't have in mind any package that requires the
> removal
> of the old version in orde
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> PS: I'm not sure about this, but it seems that the old version of
>> the package must not be installed on the system in order to build
>> the new package. Could someone try to build it and confirm?
>>
>
> confirmed. It finds the old
>
> PS: I'm not sure about this, but it seems that the old version of
> the package must not be installed on the system in order to build
> the new package. Could someone try to build it and confirm?
>
confirmed. It finds the old module in the path which does not have the same
hierarchy a
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
> ...
>> Please test it.
>
> I installed, and it works for me. I always get the message "::: Using
> minido
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
...
> Please test it.
I installed, and it works for me. I always get the message "::: Using
minidom" every time I process a file, which I didn't get before t
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will get a few compilations in for you tomorrow.
Thanks in advance for the feedback.
> I presume the package is named 11.99 to allow for the 12 upgrade?
Yes, that's it.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAI
On 06-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>>
>> the source is 600 so we can not download it.
>
> My apologies. It is strange that scp copied them all 644 except from
> this one. Fixed now.
>
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>
> the source is 600 so we can not download it.
My apologies. It is strange that scp copied them all 644 except from
this one. Fixed now.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a nice, huge dual 1.7ghz 500MB RAM machine on loan currently. Will get
> in a few builds for you this weekend.
Nifty ;-)
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
--
T
On 05-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
> Building the package takes a huge amount of time (the whole
> documentation is processed with 4xslt, which is known as one of the
> slowest XSLT processors) and packaging becomes
>
> I put it at:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>
> The package is now compatible with python-xml. Please test it. If
> you think that is is reliable enough, I'll upload it and will be
> able to close #128604, at last.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
