Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Montag, 2. Juni 2008 14:52:05 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > At least, current practice in this case is to put everything > in /usr/lib. This is something I did and of course works. Currently I do install everything into /usr/share except the binary parts (.so files). I have those in /usr/lib an

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Manuel Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is > Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split > the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part > of the app out

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 31 mai 2008 à 22:00 +0200, Manuel Prinz a écrit : > I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is > Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split > the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-01 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Andreas! Am Sonntag, 1. Juni 2008 14:43:38 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Or if /usr/share/pdb2pqr is the directory to start from just do the > symlinking and dependency the other way around. I'm not enough of a python > expert to give some hints how private modules could be found otherwise - > but

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote: The package is pdb2pqr, you can find it here: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/pdb2pqr/trunk/ Without having a look into this ... The current version puts everything to /usr/lib/pdb2pqr as that seems to please lintian. I tried to spli

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-01 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Andreas! Am Sonntag, 1. Juni 2008 08:12:41 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Perhaps I'm missing something, but why do you think you can not split the > packages? If you set Depends correctly this will ensure that the private > modules will be available. Perhaps giving a link to some Vcs / download >

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-05-31 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote: I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part of the app out to /usr/