On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:37:15AM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
| On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 18:22, Ben Burton wrote:
| >
| > Hi. So I'm packaging decompyle which decompiles a .pyc bytecode file and
| > converts it back to python source.
|
| No offense, but when would you need such a tool? I'm not
> > Hi. So I'm packaging decompyle which decompiles a .pyc bytecode file and
> > converts it back to python source.
>
> No offense, but when would you need such a tool? I'm not critical to
> packaging this for debian, just wondering when I would need it.
I've already used it once, when I inadver
On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 18:22, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. So I'm packaging decompyle which decompiles a .pyc bytecode file and
> converts it back to python source.
>
No offense, but when would you need such a tool? I'm not critical to
packaging this for debian, just wondering when I would need it.
* Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02 19:20]:
>
> > c) A wrapper that auto-detects the format of the .pyc file and calls the
> > according variant (detection of the .pyc format should be pretty easy,
> > it's just a magic number, cf. /usr/share/misc/magic).
>
> Hm, I'll try and find some docum
> c) A wrapper that auto-detects the format of the .pyc file and calls the
> according variant (detection of the .pyc format should be pretty easy,
> it's just a magic number, cf. /usr/share/misc/magic).
Hm, I'll try and find some documentation on how to extract the version
information.
> > If th
* Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02 18:22]:
>
> Hi. So I'm packaging decompyle which decompiles a .pyc bytecode file and
> converts it back to python source.
>
> Thing is, decompyle needs to be run with the same version of python that was
> used to create the bytecode.
>
> So the questio
6 matches
Mail list logo
