On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 at 10:42:19 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth:
...
So my question is should I rename the source field to “python3-
packagename” too or will it cause any conflicts?
The source package ("Source:") should not be prefixed with "python3
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 09:02:24AM +, Aryan Karamtoth wrote:
I read somewhere in some documentation given by Debian Python Team and they
said that “python-packagename” stands for a library in Python 2 and
“python3-packagename” must be the convention for python 3 librarie.
That's about bin
brarie.
From: Carsten Schoenert
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 2:12:19 PM
To: Aryan Karamtoth ; debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library
Hello Aryan,
Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth:
...
> So my question is should
, July 1, 2025 2:12:19 PM
To: Aryan Karamtoth ; debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library
Hello Aryan,
Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth:
...
> So my question is should I rename the source field to “pyth
, 2025 2:12:19 PM
To: Aryan Karamtoth ; debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library
Hello Aryan,
Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth:
...
> So my question is should I rename the source field to “python3-
> packagename”
Hello Aryan,
Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth:
...
So my question is should I rename the source field to “python3-
packagename” too or will it cause any conflicts?
the common sense is to prefix the source package with "python" without
any version numbers.
And the bin package for
6 matches
Mail list logo
