Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/12/msg00031.html
> >
> > nice try... but it worked! i'll give it a look this evening ET
>
> You didnt specify this was a totally new package. now I dont have the
> time to review it
Sorry to hear that. I thought it was clear i
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Alberto Caso wrote:
>>
>> Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k package
>>
>> pydbus does not add a py3k to an py2-only package, but provides both a
>> py2 and
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Alberto Caso wrote:
>
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k package
>
> pydbus does not add a py3k to an py2-only package, but provides both a
> py2 and a py3k package. Does that qualify? 0:-)
>
> https://lists.deb
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k package
pydbus does not add a py3k to an py2-only package, but provides both a
py2 and a py3k package. Does that qualify? 0:-)
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/12/msg00031.html
Thank you in advance.
Hello Ruben,
i've just uploaded pychromecast, thanks for your contribution!
it seems weird that you want zeroconf and protobuf for py3k in
build-depends but not their python2 versions, while they are listed in
requirements.txt: i'd say either list them for both stacks or none?
also the test discov
i can take care of this in ~6 hrs
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> Dear fellow Python Modules Team members,
>
> I have prepared the Python3 binary package for pychromecast. (all
> dependencies are now in sid finally)
> Since I am a DM only, I cannot upload new binary packa
6 matches
Mail list logo
