Quoting Anthony Towns :
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:38:57AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > Note that additionaly all packages that depend on plucker _and_ python
> must
> > use "Depends: plucker, python2.1" and _not_ "Depends: plucker, python
> (>= 2.1),
> > python (<<2.2)".
>
> Uh, no, the
Just wanted to point out that plucker do contain some python modules
(in /usr/lib/python2.1/...), but they are used _only by plucker
itself_. There is no documented anything except for the programs that
live in /usr/bin. Thats why I want to have the name as plucker. No
versioning and no python i
Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mikael Hedin writes:
> > Hi, I'm just finishing my new plucker package. And then I read the
> > policy again, and it said I should call my program python2.1-plucker,
> > as I use method 2 and the upstream name is plucker.
>
> Is plucker an applica
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:38:57AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Note that additionaly all packages that depend on plucker _and_ python must
> use "Depends: plucker, python2.1" and _not_ "Depends: plucker, python (>=
> 2.1),
> python (<<2.2)".
Uh, no, they should *not* do that. Consider what
Mikael Hedin writes:
> Hi, I'm just finishing my new plucker package. And then I read the
> policy again, and it said I should call my program python2.1-plucker,
> as I use method 2 and the upstream name is plucker.
Is plucker an application or a library (probably both ...)
> But this is not
5 matches
Mail list logo
