[ I'm not lost, just way too occupied with other issues, sorry ]
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
> 08:34:04 +0200):
>
> > In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (inten
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
08:34:04 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
>
> +1
>
> In order to control the transition,
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
+1
In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to
package) for Adam's python-magic as https://bugs.debian.org/877849
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Adam Hupp: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 3 Oct 2017
11:06:38 -0700):
That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
Best regards,
Mathias
> Sorry about the slow response. This has been a pain for a while. I
> have a prov
wrote:
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
> 18:24:25 +0200):
>
>> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>>
>> > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep
>> > 2017 19:38:56
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
18:45:31 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual
> > release of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
18:24:25 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep
> > 2017 19:38:56 +0200):
>
> > &
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual release
> of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next release of Tryton).
> For
> now there is only one usage of python-magic[6], so probably best to patch
> relatorio for now to use file-
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017
> 19:38:56 +0200):
> > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both upstreams together and
> > ask them to reconcile the APIs and eventually make one of
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017
19:38:56 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
> (...)
> > OTOH the package providing pytho
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
(...)
> OTOH the package providing python-magic on PyPi[3] is provided by another
> Upstream[4].
... and I assume the APIs are not identical?
> The cleanest solution for me would look like
> - pac
On September 4, 2017 11:42:56 AM EDT, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
>Hi Christoph, hi folks,
>
>there exists an odd namespace conflict for python-magic.
>
>Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package
>'file'[0].
>According to the included setup.py the package for the python bindings
12 matches
Mail list logo