OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 19:57, je disais:
> Which can be shorten to:
> ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> common-install-indep::
> PYTHONPATH='debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(cdbs_python_support_path)/' \
> python tests/runner.py
> endif
Whi
OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 19:44, je disais:
> I use this snippet then (with cdbs):
> ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> common-install-indep::
> PYTHONPATH='debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(cdbs_python_support_path)/' \
> python tests/runner.py
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 16:21,
Josselin Mouette disait :
>> I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
>> build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
>> tests. Because the path has changed, this d
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 16:21,
Josselin Mouette disait :
>> I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
>> build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
>> tests. Because the path has changed, this d
* Josselin Mouette [2009-03-02 16:21:20 +0100]:
> Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 15:48 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> > I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
> > build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
> > tests. Because the path has
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 15:48 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
> build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
> tests. Because the path has changed, this does not work any more.
>
> You suggest to
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 23 février 2009, vers 10:12,
Josselin Mouette disait :
>> Do we need to upload a new version when there is a fix needed? In this
>> case, I suppose we should use python-support in unstable instead of the
>> one in experimental?
> Yes, it is possible
Le mercredi 18 février 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> However I wish I could be so sure about building packages, but the
> metadata format has changed so you can expect some big failures. I have
> used a few sample packages during my testing, but this is far from
> enough.
I have
Le dimanche 22 février 2009 à 12:26 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> Do we need to upload a new version when there is a fix needed? In this
> case, I suppose we should use python-support in unstable instead of the
> one in experimental?
Yes, it is possible to fix packages so that they work wit
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 18 février
2009, vers 23:55, Josselin Mouette disait :
> As such, it would be very nice if people maintaining various kinds of
> Python packages could test building them with the new version and see
> whether the resulting packages act
10 matches
Mail list logo
