Re: Maintenance of pydap

2016-06-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > I engaged with the pydap community and I can confirm that the project > has moved on from the old 2.x API. Since pydap 3.x is now using a new > namespace (pydap instead of dap), then both package versions should be > co-inst

Re: Maintenance of pydap

2016-06-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Sandro, I engaged with the pydap community and I can confirm that the project has moved on from the old 2.x API. Since pydap 3.x is now using a new namespace (pydap instead of dap), then both package versions should be co-installable. Since I need the pydap 3.x API for hdf-compass, I propose

Re: Maintenance of pydap

2016-01-28 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
I believe upstream has moved on from the API of 2.x (dap namespace) to using 3.x (pydap namespace). My assumption is based on the facts that: 1) the upstream repository [1] provide tags for 3.x releases only, 2) active issues, such as Python 3 support, are milestoned for 3.2.x [2], [1] https://

Re: Maintenance of pydap

2016-01-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
for a start, you can try to get upstream to reply to this (old) question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pydap/6A6q-Y6qwtE On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to > discuss this matter. > > > ---