Re: Experimental slink python and jpython packages

1998-10-13 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 04:13:40PM +0300, Arto Astala wrote: > > 2.) Play risk. Adopt a new scheme similar to my proposal, e.g. > > > > - Remove python-net, python-misc; new package python-lib. This would > > break a few packages' dependencies; those had to be rebuilt. > > Apart of other change

Re: Experimental slink python and jpython packages

1998-10-13 Thread Lorenzo M. Catucci
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > > 1.) Play safe. Stick with the current scheme for slink. I'll upload a > new revision 1.5.1-5 with minor fixes only (all official patches > applied). > This is how I think we should go... > > 2.) Play risk. Adopt a new scheme similar to my proposa

Re: Experimental slink python and jpython packages

1998-10-13 Thread Arto Astala
Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:34:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > We don't know a timeline for the freeze, and there was not very much > reaction to the packages above. I guess that leaves us with two > options: > > 1.) Play safe. Stick with the current scheme for slin

Re: Experimental slink python and jpython packages

1998-10-13 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:34:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Gregor Hoffleit writes: > > Hi, > > > > I placed new experimental packages of python and jpython on my private > > web page, http://www.mathi.uni-heidelberg.de/~flight/debian-private/. > > > > Sorry that I still not managed

Re: Experimental slink python and jpython packages

1998-10-01 Thread Lorenzo M. Catucci
I told to stay tuned... And now here I am, still waiting for your upcoming Debian Python Policy... But I see some part of it, at least... On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > Hi, > > - removal of python-net and python-misc > - instead, a new package python-lib > Nice, I think it was ab