On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:07:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Brian Sutherland , 2012-05-10, 10:36:
> >AFAIK, the problem is double build failures because dpkg detects
> >that there are leftovers/changes from the first build. You end up
> >with failures when a second build is attempted [1].
> >
>
* Brian Sutherland , 2012-05-10, 10:36:
AFAIK, the problem is double build failures because dpkg detects that
there are leftovers/changes from the first build. You end up with
failures when a second build is attempted [1].
This leads people to use workarounds like this snippet taken from the
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:28:57PM -0400, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Le 04/05/2012 13:23, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
> >CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
> >setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
> >handle this case.
>
> Can you
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-05-04, 13:29:
> >>>Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg
> >>>directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of
> >>>setup.py. While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean
> >>>target in deb
On May 04, 2012, at 07:16 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' & 'packaging'?
>
>Let's see if I get all these right:
>
>distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library
>setuptools
On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' & 'packaging'?
Let's see if I get all these right:
distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library
setuptools: third party module to add functionality that distutils lac
On 04/05/12 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> or in setuptools.
Ideally, by burning it with fire.
>>>
>>> CPython upstreams are d
On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >>> or in setuptools.
> >>
> >> Ideally, by burning it with fire.
> >
> > CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-05-04, 13:29:
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg
directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py.
While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean target in
debian/rules, it seems better to fix the problem either in dh_
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> or in setuptools.
>>
>> Ideally, by burning it with fire.
>
> CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
> setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
Hi list,
Le 04/05/2012 13:23, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
handle this case.
Can you explain what the problem is? (I never packaged something that
uses setuptoo
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> > Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
> > that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While I could
> > add the appropriate bits to each clean target in debian/rules, it seems
> > better to fix the
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> or in setuptools.
>
> Ideally, by burning it with fire.
CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
handle this case.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka
* Vincent Bernat , 2012-05-04, 19:05:
I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
opinion.
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
that is not cleaned up by the clean tar
On 04/05/12 18:05, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
> always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
> opinion.
>
> Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
> that is
15 matches
Mail list logo
