Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2010-02-02 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney writes: > […] while the ‘python-coverage’ binary package is now building > correctly, the ‘python-coverage-dbg’ binary package contains nothing > useful; it's as though there is no content for that package detected > by the tools. Isn't that exactly why I'm using Debhelper >= 7.3.5 in

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-12-26 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > > Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the > > next release […] > > I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm > ending up with a source package that installs none of the Python files > into any of

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:31:02AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Thanks, ‘backintime’ does indeed meet these criteria. > > The ‘debian/rules’ file is doing some things that I'm confused about: > > = > override_dh_auto_clean: > rm -rf locale common/po/*.mo > find $(CURDIR) -name "

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > > Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the > > next release […] > > I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm > ending up with a source package that installs none of the Python files > into any of

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 18 octobre 2009 à 10:31 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : > = > override_dh_pysupport: > dh_pysupport /usr/share/backintime/ > = > > Is this necessary? Why can't ‘dh_pysupport’ do this without being > overridden here? Yes, dh_pysupport only looks at /usr/share/$package and

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-17 Thread Ben Finney
Jonathan Wiltshire writes: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:40:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > * uses ‘debhelper’ vversion 7 or later […] > > * uses ‘python-support’ > > * creates multiple packages, preferably including a ‘foo-dbg’ package > > IIRC, backintime does all but the -dbg of these things.

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages (was: RFS: python-coverage 3.0.1-1)

2009-10-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:40:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Can someone point me to an existing package that: > > * uses ‘debhelper’ vversion 7 or later (i.e. uses the implied-sequence > ‘dh’ command instead of explicit lists of ‘dh_foo’ commands) > > * uses ‘python-support’ > > * creates