IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 12:45 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Relatedly, Alioth is going to be shut down at some point, with git
>> repositories frozen and made read-only, so it would seem a good idea to
>> start migrating git packaging to salsa.debian.org before that ha
On 01/19/2018 12:45 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
>
> Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I on
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I only
maintain one package in DPMT (tap.py) and every tim
3 matches
Mail list logo
