On 11/29/2010 12:27 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Of course you are still welcome to update packages, please send the according
>> patches to me and I'll apply them.
>
> Please apply the patch in attach.
attachment missing.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Develo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Even though the policy doesn't explain what Build-Depends-Indep is, it
>> says that Build-Depends-Indep should be present for these Makefile
>> targets:
>> build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep
>>
>> But there are no such targets in t
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Even though the policy doesn't explain what Build-Depends-Indep is, it
>> says that Build-Depends-Indep should be present for these Makefile
>> targets:
>> build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep
>>
>> But there are no such targets in t
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
> > Cool. Why Python Application Team list is not there?
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-apps-team
>
> lists.alioth.debian.org is separate
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tristan Seligmann
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik
>> wrote:
>>> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
>>
>> FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/sear
On 10/26/2010 06:04 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>
>> I don't mind that beginners in packaging have write access to our
>> repositories,
>> assuming that they're willing to learn the necessary details during their
>> work
>> within the tea
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/search.html
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
>> I know basics about Makefiles - I know that target is and what 4-space
>> indents from PEP-8 are unwelcome there. But Debian Policy tells that
>> debian/rules should contain build-indep target for
>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tristan Seligmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
>
> FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/search.html
Cool. Why Python Application Team list is not there?
http:/
anatoly techtonik wrote:
> I know basics about Makefiles - I know that target is and what 4-space
> indents from PEP-8 are unwelcome there. But Debian Policy tells that
> debian/rules should contain build-indep target for
^^
> Build-Depends-Indep, and there is no such rule in t
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> I don't mind that beginners in packaging have write access to our
> repositories,
> assuming that they're willing to learn the necessary details during their work
> within the team. But as you're neither willing to learn how packaging soft
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Filippo Rusconi
wrote:
>
> in fact, I understand that you are mainly asking for general packaging
> practice details. Have you looked at
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
>
> which does a fairly good job at explaining the basics of Debian
> package prepara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/26/2010 12:03 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Ah, you can also look at what other packages does - it's a very good
>> way to learn "how to package".
>
> I'm already trying to understand the packaging of trac-bitten - that's
> why these questions.
Hello, Anatoly,
in fact, I understand that you are mainly asking for general packaging
practice details. Have you looked at
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
which does a fairly good job at explaining the basics of Debian
package preparation, and which is certainly the most appropriate gat
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:16, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-I
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:16, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
>>> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
>>> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
>> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
>> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
>
> look it up on Debian Policy - a
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 09:34, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
look it up on Debian Policy - and
18 matches
Mail list logo
