Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. > > Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight (I blame post-FOSDEM illness). That isn't actually what you need if you w

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 4. Februar 2020 23:27:13 MEZ schrieb Simon McVittie : >On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner >... >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' > >This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267). Thanks, yes, that prevents the inst

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner ... > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267). Upload was delayed by FOSDEM, needing a glib2.0 upload to be built first (to have the right Breaks for t

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:24:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> I think this is now in shape to be started. > > > > Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 tra

Re: libgcc_s breakage Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread jamesalex12
good - I am working as a network technician .very passionate to learn new technologies. every new updates are very interesting to learn.this is the tech place to know about new things Field Services Technician -- Sent from: http://debian.2.n7.nabble.com/debian-python-f2042993.html

libgcc_s breakage Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Matthias Klose wrote: On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Meanwhile, multiple packages seem to FTBFS on s390x with the new libgcc_s (I've just opened the bug for that, so no bug number known yet), which is going to limit the ability to get things into testing. please retry your packag

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Matthias Klose
On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I think this is now in shape to be started. > > Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 transition > and the restructuring of the libgcc_s packaging have settled down? >

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > I think this is now in shape to be started. Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 transition and the restructuring of the libgcc_s packaging have settled down? I'm still trying to sort out the missing Breaks aro

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:12:08PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > e.g. fontforge is still red in > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. > > > > > > That means that a rebuild of stuff using fon

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > e.g. fontforge is still red in > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. > > > > That means that a rebuild of stuff using fontforge in the build will > > just FTBFS since it will be called with python3.8

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 05:53:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: > > >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. > > >> It's not > > >> yet ready, however

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 2/2/20 5:53 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. It's not yet ready, however it would be good to see affect

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. > >> It's not > >> yet ready, however it would be good to see affected packages. Please copy > >> it > >> from

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 1/18/20 9:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Matthias, > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. It's >> not >> yet ready, however it would be good to see affe