* 2007-02-23 11:15, wrote:
> hi,
Hi!
> In the next 4 hours I repeatedly tried to use the migration tool of Plone
> to update my Plone site. It turned out that the new version of
> exUserFolder 0.50 is completely different , so I removed from the
> instance and manually put my old (patched) 0.20
hi,
as I already told, I have a Etch box (amd64) that I installed
from scratch ; but I still keep my zope server in a Sarge i386 chroot
(using zope 2.7, plone 2.0 (self installed) and other zope products).
since the Etch release is near, and this bug is raising
the question, I decided to try to p
things are even worse than I would imagine
the migratation of my Plone site from 2.0.5 (=Sarge) to
2.5.1 (=Etch) fails
the main problem is that I was using I18NLayer to translate
documents in many languages, and this product is not compatible
with newer Plone
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"The EULA s
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:12:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> OTOH, I also don't see why it's important to avoid
> removal of zope2.7 on upgrade, it /is/ an obsolete package from the etch
> perspective.
Because there is not a guaranteed a smooth upgrade between Zope packages,
and products ther
Hi Steve,
first of all, thanks for your reply.
* 2007-02-21 21:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think that changing the dependency on zope-common to something like:
> > Depends: python (>= 2.4) | python2.4, ...
> > would do the trick,
>
> No, this would definitely be wrong. The package either use
On 21/02/2007 Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2007-02-21 17:33, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > If i understand it correctly, zope-common should depend on python2.4,
> > but not on python (>= 2.4), and use python2.4 directly.
> >
> > This would avoid an upgrade of the default python package and just
> > int
* 2007-02-21 17:33, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> If i understand it correctly, zope-common should depend on python2.4,
> but not on python (>= 2.4), and use python2.4 directly.
>
> This would avoid an upgrade of the default python package and just
> introduce the new python2.4 package. This way, the old
On 21/02/2007 Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2007-02-21 15:17, A Mennucc wrote:
> > >
> > > Depends: python (>= 2.4) | python2.4, ...
> > >
> > > would do the trick, leaving the old python package around without removing
> > > python2.3, but I'm not even sure and to say the truth I do not understa
hi
I agree : forcing a removal of zope2.7 on upgrade Sarge -> Etch is really a
bad idea
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> I think that changing the dependency on zope-common to something like:
>
> Depends: python (>= 2.4) | python2.4, ...
>
> would do the t
* 2007-02-21 15:17, A Mennucc wrote:
> >
> > Depends: python (>= 2.4) | python2.4, ...
> >
> > would do the trick, leaving the old python package around without removing
> > python2.3, but I'm not even sure and to say the truth I do not understand
> > why the dependency on python2.4 has been repl
10 matches
Mail list logo
