On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 03:13, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le ven 21/11/2003 à 01:49, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > Unfortunately, the policy fails to take into account all the
> > source-package and build-depends issues. This means the clean separation
> > of python and pythonX.Y is not actually that c
Hi, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[ Please don't delete attributions ]
> Matthias Klose:
>> some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
>> version 2.2, but install packages from unstable, when the default
>> versions were different in testing and unstable.
>
> I do doubt such spe
Le ven 21/11/2003 à 01:49, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> Unfortunately, the policy fails to take into account all the
> source-package and build-depends issues. This means the clean separation
> of python and pythonX.Y is not actually that clean... some more work is
> needed on the policy to resolve t
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 09:16, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
> > >
> > > What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
> > > 'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
> >
> > some people wanted to be able to keep the default python v
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
>> >
>> > What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
>> > 'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
>>
>> some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
>> v
> > The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
> >
> > What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
> > 'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
>
> some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
> version 2.2, but install packages from unstable, wh
Junichi Uekawa writes:
> > well, I think this is bug in these packages. OTOH, if there are too
> > many of these, it might be better to change it back. I did never see
> > much sense in keeping pythonX.Y without keeping python.
>
> The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
>
> What wa
> > python2.3 (2.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Downgrade the dependency of python2.3 on python (>= 2.3) to
> > a recommendation.
> >
> > this seems to have caused buildds to fail because 'python' does not
> > exist when building packages build-depending on python2.3-dev
> >
> >
Junichi Uekawa writes:
> Package: python2.3
> Version: 2.3.2-3
>
> python2.3 (2.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Downgrade the dependency of python2.3 on python (>= 2.3) to
> a recommendation.
>
> this seems to have caused buildds to fail because 'python' does not
> exist when building
9 matches
Mail list logo
