yokota, on 2024-05-13:
> py7zr 0.21 is now split-out all architecture-dependent binary module
> to external python modules.
> And py7zr target architecture is changed to "all".
> I think we send RM request to Debian release team to drop old
> architecture-dependent packages.
Removal requests may n
Hi Yokota,
yokota, on 2024-05-12:
> py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.
> Please examine salsa repository and upload to Debian if it looks well.
I reviewed through your changes in py7zr and ran a couple of
tests, notably the ones from the reverse dependency "calibre".
I have not seen matter for
Hello Étienne,
> py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.
py7zr 0.21 is now split-out all architecture-dependent binary module
to external python modules.
And py7zr target architecture is changed to "all".
I think we send RM request to Debian release team to drop old
architecture-dependent packages.
Hello Étienne,
py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.
Please examine salsa repository and upload to Debian if it looks well.
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/py7zr
--
YOKOTA Hiroshi
Hi Hiroshi,
Am Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:34:23AM +0900 schrieb yokota:
> > When writing this I'm wondering whether it might be better to remove
> > this in Files-Excluded. On one hand this saves us from mentioning the
> > copyright on the other hand we could be really sure that it is not used.
> >
Hello,
> When writing this I'm wondering whether it might be better to remove
> this in Files-Excluded. On one hand this saves us from mentioning the
> copyright on the other hand we could be really sure that it is not used.
> What do you think - should I override the previous upload without that
Hi again,
Am Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 11:54:00AM +0900 schrieb yokota:
> Hello,
>
> I think these packages are now ready for upload to NEW queue.
> Please examine them.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-brotlicffi
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065221
7 matches
Mail list logo
