On Thursday, April 16, 2015 06:45:08 PM Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2015.04.15_18:30:23_+0200)
>
> > If we are sharing dist-packages, then pypy can probably use the same
> > binary when the content would be the same. Only in cases where the
> > content is different would you duplicate a sepa
Hi Scott (2015.04.15_18:30:23_+0200)
> If we are sharing dist-packages, then pypy can probably use the same
> binary when the content would be the same. Only in cases where the
> content is different would you duplicate a separate pypy package.
That works, but only for leaf packages. Transitive de
On April 15, 2015 11:24:30 AM EDT, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>Hi Scott (2015.04.15_17:19:39_+0200)
>> Since these pypy extension packages are new and there are no
>applications, I
>> think it would make a lot of sense to limit this to PY3. It makes
>things much
>> simpler technically. We should no
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 04:54:45 PM Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2015.04.15_02:17:18_+0200)
>
> > >Consensus seems to be "give it a shot" and try to see what works.
> > >There are no pypy apps, so this isn't an issue yet.
> >
> > What is the "it" that's to be given a shot? I see two cho
Hi Scott (2015.04.15_17:19:39_+0200)
> Since these pypy extension packages are new and there are no applications, I
> think it would make a lot of sense to limit this to PY3. It makes things
> much
> simpler technically. We should not recreate the symlink farm we used to have
> for python.
>
Hi Scott (2015.04.15_02:17:18_+0200)
> >Consensus seems to be "give it a shot" and try to see what works.
> >There are no pypy apps, so this isn't an issue yet.
>
> What is the "it" that's to be given a shot? I see two choices there?
Give python3 + pypy3 shared dist-packages a shot.
> Did you di
6 matches
Mail list logo
