Re: PEP 384 (was Re: Bits from dh_python2 author ;-)

2010-05-28 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-05-28] > On May 16, 2010, at 02:21 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >What's missing to have full PEP3147 support? > >* PEP 384 implementation (will allow us to share (most?) .so files) > > I have a concern about this. > > While I understand the motivation, I'm not sure implemen

PEP 384 (was Re: Bits from dh_python2 author ;-)

2010-05-27 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 16, 2010, at 02:21 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >What's missing to have full PEP3147 support? >* PEP 384 implementation (will allow us to share (most?) .so files) I have a concern about this. While I understand the motivation, I'm not sure implementing PEP 384 will have any practical help i

Re: Bits from dh_python2 author ;-)

2010-05-16 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Jakub Wilk, 2010-05-16] > * Piotr Ożarowski , 2010-05-16, 14:21: > >I also plan to rename dh_python2 to dh_python before package will > >be uploaded to unstable (and ask debhelper maintainers to remove > >theirs or rewrite mine in Perl and move it to debhelper package). > > Do you have a plan how

Re: Bits from dh_python2 author ;-)

2010-05-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2010-05-16, 14:21: I also plan to rename dh_python2 to dh_python before package will be uploaded to unstable (and ask debhelper maintainers to remove theirs or rewrite mine in Perl and move it to debhelper package). Do you have a plan how to deal with packages which still u