On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The point is, some people also use venvs. In a world of Python 3 only,
> some upstream will continue to use /usr/bin/python (IMO, rightly). We
> should be able to provide a default implementation for these scripts.
I think this is a bug in
On 11/07/2016 04:21 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, November 07, 2016 10:08:25 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Nov 07, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> So, I don't agree with you, and believe that gradually using
>>> #!/usr/bin/python2 is a good approach to the transition. IMO, tha
On Monday, November 07, 2016 10:08:25 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 07, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >So, I don't agree with you, and believe that gradually using
> >#!/usr/bin/python2 is a good approach to the transition. IMO, that's
> >what we should start doing as much as possibl
On Nov 07, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>So, I don't agree with you, and believe that gradually using
>#!/usr/bin/python2 is a good approach to the transition. IMO, that's
>what we should start doing as much as possible.
>
>If the dependencies for Python itself aren't calculated well w
On 11/01/2016 11:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 01, 2016 05:14:21 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It
>>> should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I th
On November 1, 2016 8:43:50 PM EDT, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman
>wrote:
>>
>> Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be
>users who
>> keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate things due to
>$REASONS. Re-
>> using /usr/bi
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be users who
> keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate things due to $REASONS. Re-
> using /usr/bin/python for a python3 version won't accomplish anything more
> than
On Tuesday, November 01, 2016 05:14:21 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It
> >should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of
> >/usr/bin/python2 is a limite
On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It
>should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of
>/usr/bin/python2 is a limited to a work around for a specific distros
>insanity. There's no need
On November 1, 2016 10:28:01 AM EDT, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>Over in #834193, a user is asking for a /usr/bin/pip2 to mirror
>/usr/bin/pip
>because some uses cases apparently prefer pip2 over pip. That seems
>like a
>reasonable request on the face of it, and easy to support.
>
>However, I thought,
10 matches
Mail list logo
