Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

Il 29/12/2016 18:17, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:20:23AM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi! > > FYI, I found your RFS only thanks to the /topic in #debian-python. > Unless you're very lucky most RFSes sent to random mailing lists have a > tendency to get lost/ig

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

Hi Mattia, It is still in my TODO list to process your detailed feedback to the RFS I sent to the mailing list (thanks BTW !). I think I should manage to do that before May but I'm always happy if anybody steps in. I'll CC the ITP bug as well... Paolo Il 04/04/2017 19:31, Mattia Rizzolo ha s

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

Hey Paolo, any news of this package? (explicitly CCing you to be extra sure it'll reach you) (And this is why I prefer RFS bugs, btw, saving me from digging in my mail archive to find this one…) On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:20:23AM

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:20:23AM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, Hi! FYI, I found your RFS only thanks to the /topic in #debian-python. Unless you're very lucky most RFSes sent to random mailing lists have a tendency to get lost/ignored; that's why I suggest you always file a RFS bug and X-Deb

RFS: python-patch 1.16

Hi, I packaged python-patch as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/845482, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-patch.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Please note that since the pypi tarball has