Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Ben Finney [2014-01-27 10:37:06 +1100]: > Nicolas Dandrimont writes: > > > - Dust off the team's PET instance ([1], which looks rather outdated). > > [1] - http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi > > I've never seen PET before. It seems redundant with the official QA > Packa

Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > Thanks for bringing PET to my attention. But I wonder whether it's > unused for good reason? The only reason it is unused is people don't know about it or forget it exists. > What does PET do which the Packages Overview tool does not? It look

QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Ben Finney
Nicolas Dandrimont writes: > - Dust off the team's PET instance ([1], which looks rather outdated). > [1] - http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi I've never seen PET before. It seems redundant with the official QA Packages Overview tool for each maintainer, which for DPMT is a