-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> python-flup is not an official package (yet?), so what's wrong
>> with giving a bit of an ad-hoc work-around?
>
> Because we'll see again a young maintainer giving such advice
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> python-flup is not an official package (yet?), so what's wrong with
> giving a bit of an ad-hoc work-around?
Because we'll see again a young maintainer giving such advice to his
bugreporter like if it was a real solution in a proper Debian system.
So ple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Coin,
>
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Making a symlink from python2.4 to python would probably do the
>> trick.
>
> Are you root of the world and gonna do this ugly hack on every
> computer on earth ???
Coin,
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Making a symlink from python2.4 to python would probably do the trick.
Are you root of the world and gonna do this ugly hack on every computer
on earth ???
Now please stop with the python symlinks, this has no common sense ;
you're giving bad ide
Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > There is no such package in unstable. It is certainly possible to *build*
> > > a package against unstable which depends on python (>= 2.4), but such a
> > > package is not installable in unstable right now and therefore unsuitable
> > > for upload.
>
> >
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:22:17AM +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:49:10PM +0900, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > > On 2006-06-19T09:45+0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > flup was probably built with python as found in experimental.
> > > It
Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:49:10PM +0900, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > On 2006-06-19T09:45+0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > flup was probably built with python as found in experimental.
>
> > It was built on unstable.
>
> By whom?
>
> There is no such package in un
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:49:10PM +0900, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 2006-06-19T09:45+0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> > flup was probably built with python as found in experimental.
> It was built on unstable.
By whom?
There is no such package in unstable. It is certainly possible to *build*
a package
On 2006-06-19T09:45+0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> flup was probably built with python as found in experimental.
It was built on unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kai Hendry writes:
> http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/flup_0.2015-1_i386.changes
> python-flup: Depends: python (>= 2.4) but 2.3.5-10 is to be installed
> E: Unmet dependencies. Try #apt-get -f install# with no packages (or specify
> a solution).
> sam$
>
> Do you know how I am supposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kai Hendry wrote:
> http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/flup_0.2015-1_i386.changes
>
> sam$ sudo dpkg -i python-flup_0.2015-1_all.deb
> (Reading database ... 133811 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace python-flup 0.1968
http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/flup_0.2015-1_i386.changes
sam$ sudo dpkg -i python-flup_0.2015-1_all.deb
(Reading database ... 133811 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace python-flup 0.1968-1 (using python-flup_0.2015-1_all.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement python-f
12 matches
Mail list logo
