Re: Python program as a command-line program

Barry Warsaw writes: > On Jun 23, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > > >There isn't, AFAIK, anything portable that I can write in the shebang > >to turn a command invocation of ‘./foo/bar.py’ into ‘python3 -m > >foo.bar’. > > Why not just have a file that contains only? > > exec python3 -

Re: Python program as a command-line program (was: Python package providing both modules and an app)

On Jun 23, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Ben Finney wrote: >There isn't, AFAIK, anything portable that I can write in the shebang to >turn a command invocation of ‘./foo/bar.py’ into ‘python3 -m foo.bar’. Why not just have a file that contains only? exec python3 -m foo.bar Cheers, -Barry

Python program as a command-line program (was: Python package providing both modules and an app)

Barry Warsaw writes: > On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > > >There is a compounding tendency to disparage ‘python3 ./foo/bar.py’, > >[…]. I wish this trend could be effectively reversed, because IMO > >this is a serious impediment to considering Python a good choice for > >command-