On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > What should I be doing about this?
>
> Isuppose thatalintian overrideworks too.Create
> debian/source.lintian-overrides with:
> yourpackage source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 6
debhelper 6 has been up
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 08 janvier 2008, vers 10:34, Ben
Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> - set debian/compat to 6
>> - add a lintian override for this
> I get no error from 'lintian' for this.
Try with -vIi.
> Rather, an error from 'linda':
> E: gracie; DH_COMPAT is g
Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. Therefore, if we use pure debhelper :
> - depends on debhelper (>= 5.0.44)
That is, "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.44)".
> - set debian/compat to 6
> - add a lintian override for this
I get no error from 'lintian' for this. Rather, an error
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 22:38,
je disais:
> And we use cdbs :
> - depends on debhelper (>= 5.0.44)
> - set debian/compat to 6
> - add a lintian override for this
> - add this in debian/rules to disallow first run of dh_installinit to
>modify post
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 22:12,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> >> > debhelper (5.0.44) unstable; urgency=low
>> >> >
>> >> > * prerm and postrm scripts are now generated in a reverse
>> >> > order than preinst and postinst scrip
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:52:52PM +, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Pendant le temps de midi du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 12:50,
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> > Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> >> >> Well, if you can change the ord
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 18:52, je
disais:
> I have just tested and #386970 is still present with py_support at
> least. In postinst, I have first the snippet by dh_installinit and then
> the snippet by dh_pysupport. In prerm, I have exactly the same th
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 12:50,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> > Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
>> >> Well, if you can change the order for postinst, you will get wrong order
>> >> in prerm.
>> >
>> > debhe
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:43:59AM +, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:28:36 +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> >> Well, if you can change the order for postinst, you will get wrong order
>
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:28:36 +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
>> Well, if you can change the order for postinst, you will get wrong order
>> in prerm.
>
> debhelper (5.0.44) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * prerm a
Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> Well, if you can change the order for postinst, you will get wrong order
> in prerm.
debhelper (5.0.44) unstable; urgency=low
* prerm and postrm scripts are now generated in a reverse order than
preinst and postinst scripts.
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:17:34 +1100, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Vincent, please don't send me copies of messages sent to this list.
> This is spelled out on the mailing-list code of conduct
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>.)
Sorry for that.
>> See:
>> http://bug
(Vincent, please don't send me copies of messages sent to this list.
This is spelled out on the mailing-list code of conduct
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>.)
Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 02:06,
>
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 02:06,
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> The only way I can see to fix this is to move one of those commands so
> the corrent ordering is achieved in the postinst. Where should I be
> moving the rules around to? Should 'dh_in
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since it appears you have a *different* postinst, it's possible that
> you need something like a "#DEBHELPER#" snippet in your existing
> postinst to allow debhelper to actually put the files in the right
> place: when I was missing this in the pas
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:15:53AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> The problem apparent when installing that .deb is that after
> installation the modules *only* exist in that pycentral path; they are
> never installed to the Python site-packages directory, and so the
> Python package can't be found by
Howdy all,
In the thread Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I
attempted to learn more about packaging software such that it conforms
both to Python conventions and Debian Python policy. I got some
helpful responses, but there seem to be fundamental problems that
weren't addressed. I'm asking again n
17 matches
Mail list logo
