On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:01:00PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
| Il gio, 2004-06-17 alle 03:26, Donovan Baarda ha scritto:
| > >From looking at it, the main thing we'd loose by dropping python2.1 is
| > jython. Anyone using it?
|
| Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst seems there is en
Il gio, 2004-06-17 alle 03:26, Donovan Baarda ha scritto:
> >From looking at it, the main thing we'd loose by dropping python2.1 is
> jython. Anyone using it?
Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst seems there is enough people
that use it... I've looked also on http://www.jython.org, they say
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 21:27, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Il mer, 2004-06-16 alle 04:03, Donovan Baarda ha scritto:
[...]
> Policy? What I missed? I tried to find a Debian Python policy, but I
> didn't have enough luck. It is not listed on
> http://www.debian.org/devel/ like the perl policy or the j
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:56:53 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 13:52, Terry Hancock wrote:
> [...]
> > Zope <=2.6 needs Python 2.1.3, while Zope 2.7 and X3.0.0
> > both use Python 2.3.4 as standard (i.e. the newest Python).
> >
> > Zope 2.6 *can* run with Pyt
Il mer, 2004-06-16 alle 04:03, Donovan Baarda ha scritto:
> There are various reasons why you might need a non-current Python
> package. Typically it is for a legacy Python application that has not
> yet been "upgraded".
Now I understand your point of view... So we have to try to complete the
pyth
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 13:52, Terry Hancock wrote:
[...]
> Zope <=2.6 needs Python 2.1.3, while Zope 2.7 and X3.0.0
> both use Python 2.3.4 as standard (i.e. the newest Python).
>
> Zope 2.6 *can* run with Python 2.2 (and I think it may be the
> only version for which that's true), but it is not of
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 09:03 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Even now, there are still several
> applications, including Zope, still running on python2.2, when the
> default is python2.3 and has been for some time.
I don't think so:
Zope <=2.6 needs Python 2.1.3, while Zope 2.7 and X3.0.0
both use P
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 09:08, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mar 15/06/2004 à 19:09, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
> > In stable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.1, in testing and
> > unstable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.3... What about
> > python2.2? If I apt-get python2.2
Le mar 15/06/2004 à 19:09, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
> In stable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.1, in testing and
> unstable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.3... What about
> python2.2? If I apt-get python2.2, why I can't use slang?
Why would you want to use python2.2
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 12:09 pm, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> I know the number of packages in Debian is becoming a problem, simply I
> don't uderstand why python2.1 (and a lot of modules for python2.1) are
> available in testing (which will be stable soon) if it is an old version
> and two major v
Il mar, 2004-06-15 alle 17:13, Cory Dodt ha scritto:
> There is an implicit assumption here that python modules will actually work
> for all versions of Python. This is clearly not the case; some will use
> features only available in (some newer version X.y). Furthermore, at least a
> few (distut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is an implicit assumption here that python modules will actually work
for all versions of Python. This is clearly not the case; some will use
features only available in (some newer version X.y). Furthermore, at least a
few (distutils and difflib
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
>> I'm interested in adopting python-gd (my package is available on
>> http://www.kobold.it/python-gd). Actually there is only a whishlist
>> bug for this package (#223580) which ask for a versioned packaging
>> for the module. Actually it is available only for python2.3,
Le mar 15/06/2004 à 09:49, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
> Hi! I'm not (yet) an official dd, but I started my applicant process
> some weeks ago so I hope I'll be a DD soon. I'm interested in adopting
> python-gd (my package is available on http://www.kobold.it/python-gd).
> Actually there is only
Hi! I'm not (yet) an official dd, but I started my applicant process
some weeks ago so I hope I'll be a DD soon. I'm interested in adopting
python-gd (my package is available on http://www.kobold.it/python-gd).
Actually there is only a whishlist bug for this package (#223580) which
ask for a versi
15 matches
Mail list logo
