Bob Tanner wrote:
> Is there an agreement amongst the interested debian-python
> developers/packagers that Debian must support .egg's?
Well, let's agree that this is desirable, perhaps strongly, depending on
how widespread the use of .eggs is, to support applications using it.
> Answering the -IF-
Bob Tanner wrote:
Is there an agreement amongst the interested debian-python
developers/packagers that Debian must support .egg's?
Answering the -IF- will let us move forward to the HOW.
Terminology is really critical here. Eggs are a certain structure
of information: a meta-data system along
On Monday 28 November 2005 03:22 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You are completely misunderstanding the issue. There can be no such
> thing as "Debian support for eggs". There can only be some Debian
> packages of eggified software. And there will be, as some developers
> will want to make them.
Ve
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:51:26PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
> Starting a separate thread from the "formencode as .egg in Debian ??"
> discussion since this issue is internal to Debian and I don't want DD's to
> "beat-up" upstream development anymore. :-)
Thank you for bringing this up. The beating
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 13:51 -0600, Bob Tanner a écrit :
> IF Debian decides -not- to support .egg's a few python code bases (modules,
> applications, etc) will break.
>
> Looking into the future more python code bases will move to .egg so the
> number of broken code bases will only increase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Starting a separate thread from the "formencode as .egg in Debian ??"
discussion since this issue is internal to Debian and I don't want DD's to
"beat-up" upstream development anymore. :-)
Good or bad python .egg's are here to stay. Following the "for
6 matches
Mail list logo
