On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:08AM -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
| Debian newbie question, here. How does the progression of packages go
| within stable? Once 0.12.0 emerges, can the sources pick it up, or is
| it pretty much locked out of stable for all time?
stable packages don't progress, apart
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 06:49, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
>
> | I'd be a bit reluctant to work on patches now, given the short
> | delay, since it would be difficult for people to test the patches
> | properly before Woody goes out,
>
> Don't be too su
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 23:36, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> > able to figure out:
>
> ...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> > remove python-4suite-0.11.1 from woody and push hard to patch
> >
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
| I'd be a bit reluctant to work on patches now, given the short
| delay, since it would be difficult for people to test the patches
| properly before Woody goes out,
Don't be too sure of that. It was almost a year ago when we delayed
d
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:36:12AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> > able to figure out:
> > ...
>
> Thanks a lot.
Well, I have someinterst in this, if I am to act as a maint
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
> able to figure out:
...
Thanks a lot.
> remove python-4suite-0.11.1 from woody and push hard to patch
> python-xml-0.7.1 to fix the xml.xslt bugs
I think this going to happ
I've looked at the problem at hand, carefully, and here's what I've been
able to figure out:
On the debian package side:
- boot-floppies build-depends on python-xml
- python-4suite-0.11.1 works sort of ok with python-xml-0.6.8
- python-4suite-0.11.1 won't work with python-xml-0.7
-> the xml
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:26:48PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * There are no clashes between PyXML and 4Suite's xpath and xslt,
> > because they live in differant packates (xml and Ft.Xml)
>
> That is right if you consider 0.12aX versions of 4Suite,
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Then, I'll try to see if I can remove xslt and xpath from 4suite
>> 0.11 and ship the one in python-xml 0.7. This may "unbreak things"
>> (I don't really believe in that though).
>
> Hi,
>
> A few things that may be relevant here:
>
> * There are no
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:16:21PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>>
> >>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
> >>> an upload might be safe ...
> >>
> >> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Does this sound better?
>>
>
> definately. Although I am still confused about why I can not build the 4suite
Well, I've just realized that all links are in the Windows format, with
backslashes :/
On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
> of prerendered 4suite docs.
> I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
> happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
> to make the package conflict on the previous ve
Hi,
It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
of prerendered 4suite docs.
I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
to make the package conflict on the previous version
and avoid to render the documentation.
Doe
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
>> not a lot
>> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
>> ?
>> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
>> >>
>> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> >> an upload might be safe ...
>> >
>> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>> >
>>
>> consider people using it a
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
> >>
> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
> >> an upload might be safe ...
> >
> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
> >
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
with this arg
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>>> an upload might be safe ...
>>
>> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>>
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian
>>
>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> an upload might be safe ...
>
> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>
consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can also add:
>> Build-Conflicts: python2.1-4suite (<< 0.11.99), python2.2-4suite (<<
>> 0.11.99)
>>
>> But I don't like doing this.
>
> well, that's only a problem on _your_ machine :-) autobuilders don't
> have this package installed anyway
Jérôme Marant writes:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> > distutils yet to tackle it.
>
> I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
> know what can be done with distut
>
> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
> not a lot
> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
> ?
> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1 ?
>
damned if you do, damned if you don't. 0.12 uses a
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> distutils yet to tackle it.
I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
know what can be done with distutils (if ever it can be done with the
>>
>> 4suite is obviously updating the python search path to add its modules, the
>> modules should be added at the front of the list and not the end where they
>> seem to be added.
>
> This really sucks. I don't have in mind any package that requires the
> removal
> of the old version in orde
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> PS: I'm not sure about this, but it seems that the old version of
>> the package must not be installed on the system in order to build
>> the new package. Could someone try to build it and confirm?
>>
>
> confirmed. It finds the old
>
> PS: I'm not sure about this, but it seems that the old version of
> the package must not be installed on the system in order to build
> the new package. Could someone try to build it and confirm?
>
confirmed. It finds the old module in the path which does not have the same
hierarchy a
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
> ...
>> Please test it.
>
> I installed, and it works for me. I always get the message "::: Using
> minido
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
...
> Please test it.
I installed, and it works for me. I always get the message "::: Using
minidom" every time I process a file, which I didn't get before t
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will get a few compilations in for you tomorrow.
Thanks in advance for the feedback.
> I presume the package is named 11.99 to allow for the 12 upgrade?
Yes, that's it.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAI
On 06-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>>
>> the source is 600 so we can not download it.
>
> My apologies. It is strange that scp copied them all 644 except from
> this one. Fixed now.
>
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>
> the source is 600 so we can not download it.
My apologies. It is strange that scp copied them all 644 except from
this one. Fixed now.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a nice, huge dual 1.7ghz 500MB RAM machine on loan currently. Will get
> in a few builds for you this weekend.
Nifty ;-)
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
--
T
On 05-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
> Building the package takes a huge amount of time (the whole
> documentation is processed with 4xslt, which is known as one of the
> slowest XSLT processors) and packaging becomes
>
> I put it at:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
>
> The package is now compatible with python-xml. Please test it. If
> you think that is is reliable enough, I'll upload it and will be
> able to close #128604, at last.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Hi,
I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
Building the package takes a huge amount of time (the whole
documentation is processed with 4xslt, which is known as one of the
slowest XSLT processors) and packaging becomes more and more painful
with no real fine tuning o
34 matches
Mail list logo
