> I'd like other python team member's opinion on this, and I'm not eager
> to maintain that legacy package, as I tend to not want to maintain
> obsolete software. Still, I can do the initial work of creating it.
i wouldnt expect much maintenance needed tho: 0.8.4 is essentially
dead upstream, so i
Nilesh Patra wrote on 05/02/2022 at 20:23:44+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 00BAE74B343369F1 created at
> 2022-02-05T20:23:44+0100 using RSA]]
> On 2/6/22 12:20 AM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>> On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian G
On 2/6/22 12:20 AM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
[...]
_mistune.py within the Debian package,
and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune"
(see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nb
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > [...]
> > _mistune.py within the Debian package,
> > and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune"
> > (see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mi
Le 2022-02-04 à 11 h 24, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
On 2/4/22 9:33 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
_mistune.py within the Debian package,
and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune"
(see
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mistune.py).
That seems like an emi
Le 4 février 2022 16:57:59 GMT+01:00, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> Basically, the mistune upstream author has completely messed up on
>> this by making what is essentially a completely different package with
>> superficially similar functionality but the same
On 2/4/22 9:33 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
_mistune.py within the Debian package,
and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune"
(see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mistune.py).
That seems like an eminently sensible solution to this problem.
But tha
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Basically, the mistune upstream author has completely messed up on
> > this by making what is essentially a completely different package with
> > superficially similar functionality but the s
On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Basically, the mistune upstream author has completely messed up on
this by making what is essentially a completely different package with
superficially similar functionality but the same name.
True.
[...]
_mistune.py within the Debian package,
and have
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:34:26PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Since Mistune 2.0.0 regresses its support for standard markdown, I ask
> > that a separate package be made for mistune 2.x to give more time for
> > mistune 0.8.x users to migrate to mistune 2.x or another l
Hi Michael,
"Michael R. Crusoe" wrote on 24/01/2022 at 11:39:23+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 3C26763F6C67E6E2 created at
> 2022-01-24T11:39:23+0100 using RSA]]
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:38:44 +0100 p...@debian.org wrote:
>> Package: python3-schema-salad
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
