Re: Package name of src:fontmake

2018-01-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Paul Wise, 2018-01-28] > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:30 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > > please also remember to install this private library into private (as > > in: outside dist-packages) dir. You can do that with something like: > > Is there or should there be a lintian warning about packages n

Re: Package name of src:fontmake

2018-01-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:30 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > please also remember to install this private library into private (as > in: outside dist-packages) dir. You can do that with something like: Is there or should there be a lintian warning about packages not named python{,3}-* containing pub

Re: Package name of src:fontmake

2018-01-27 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
> >My personal intepretation is that since this package is not used as > >python library this should be "fontmake" single package, but we need > >someone from Python Teams to confirm that. > > I think that makes sense. > > You have to make a judgement call about the primary purpose of the > packa

Re: Package name of src:fontmake

2018-01-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 27, 2018 2:05:59 PM UTC, Yao Wei wrote: >Hi, > >We at Fonts Team are packaging utilities for building fonts from >Glyphs.app and UFO format to OTF/TTF, and we are trying to align our >package to Python Policy. > >The packaging effort is in Salsa: >https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/f

Package name of src:fontmake

2018-01-27 Thread Yao Wei
Hi, We at Fonts Team are packaging utilities for building fonts from Glyphs.app and UFO format to OTF/TTF, and we are trying to align our package to Python Policy. The packaging effort is in Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fontmake We feel unsettled of the binary package naming. Shou