Mathias Behrle wrote...
> JFTR: relatorio_0.8.0-1~exp1 was just built and uploaded. It builds against
> python-magic (>=2:0.4.15-1~exp1) and all tests are passing succesfully.
Good to hear, and thanks for testing. I've sent the Call for tests to
debian-devel a few minutes ago.
Christoph
si
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: [tryton-debian] Bug#877849: Namespace conflict for
python-magic" (Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:37:51 +0100):
Hi Christoph,
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > I found
> >
> > $ apt-cache rdepends python-magic
> (...)
>
> Yeah, I alrea
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Adam Hupp wrote...
> > - disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
> > anything by default unless you run python with the warning enabled
> > (-Wd), but until there's a clear plan for the future of this package
> > it seems premature to declare deprec
Adam Hupp wrote...
> Whew, I was worried for a moment :) I've pushed an update to the
> branch
Great to see.
> Changes:
> - disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
> anything by default unless you run python with the warning enabled
> (-Wd), but until there's a clear plan f
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> I found
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends python-magic
(...)
Yeah, I already had checked a few of them where possible with little
efforts. These were the test I had been talking of (actually, including
python3-magic rdeps as well).
> May be we should signal them explicitely to t
Whew, I was worried for a moment :) I've pushed an update to the
branch (note: will require a force pull if you already have a
checkout).
https://github.com/ahupp/python-magic/tree/libmagic-compat
Changes:
- disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
anything by default unless
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Bug#877849: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for
python-magic" (Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:30:22 +0100):
> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
> > Hence, here is a preliminary packaging of python-magic for Debian:
> >
> >
> > https://w
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Hence, here is a preliminary packaging of python-magic for Debian:
>
>
> https://www.in-ulm.de/~cbiedl/debian/python-magic/python-magic_0.4.15-1~exp1.dsc
>
> Debianites, please give it a try.
No reaction of any kind, so just uploaded to experimental. Let the games
be
From the popular series "Leaving fatal mistakes in spite of
proof-reading three times":
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Doing a first round of tests showed
no
> regressions so far.
You may stop panicking now :)
Christ
Adam Hupp wrote...
> I've pushed an update here:
>
> https://github.com/ahupp/python-magic/tree/libmagic-compat
>
> It includes a copy of libmagic's bindings, wrapped in deprecation
> warnings. So apps should work regardless of which they depend on.
> Could you take a look and see if this works f
[
It's getting rather Debian specific, so trimming recipicient list.
I'd prefer to discuss this on debian-python but keep me in Cc:,
thanks.
]
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> while approaching the test for relatorio I got aware, that the result won't be
> very significant, because relatorio
* Adam Hupp: " Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4
Dec 2017 11:58:22 -0800):
Hi Christoph,
while approaching the test for relatorio I got aware, that the result won't be
very significant, because relatorio depends anyway on python-magic[pypi]. To
* Adam Hupp: " Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4
Dec 2017 11:58:22 -0800):
Thanks a lot, Adam, I will take a look ASAP.
> I've pushed an update here:
>
> https://github.com/ahupp/python-magic/tree/libmagic-compat
>
> It includes
ri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Mathias Behrle: " Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for
> python-magic" (Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:01:16 +0200):
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> are there any news on the subject?
>
> The release of Tryton, that will require p
[ I'm not lost, just way too occupied with other issues, sorry ]
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
> 08:34:04 +0200):
>
> > In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (inten
* Mathias Behrle: " Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for
python-magic" (Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:01:16 +0200):
Hi Adam,
are there any news on the subject?
The release of Tryton, that will require python-magic is scheduled for next
week. It would be a great service to our users an
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Fri, 6 Oct 2017
08:34:04 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
>
> +1
>
> In order to control the transition,
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
+1
In order to control the transition, I've filed in ITP (intent to
package) for Adam's python-magic as https://bugs.debian.org/877849
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Adam Hupp: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 3 Oct 2017
11:06:38 -0700):
That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
Best regards,
Mathias
> Sorry about the slow response. This has been a pain for a while. I
> have a prov
wrote:
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
> 18:24:25 +0200):
>
>> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>>
>> > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep
>> > 2017 19:38:56
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
18:45:31 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual
> > release of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017
18:24:25 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep
> > 2017 19:38:56 +0200):
>
> > &
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual release
> of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next release of Tryton).
> For
> now there is only one usage of python-magic[6], so probably best to patch
> relatorio for now to use file-
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017
> 19:38:56 +0200):
> > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both upstreams together and
> > ask them to reconcile the APIs and eventually make one of
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017
19:38:56 +0200):
> Mathias Behrle wrote...
>
> > Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
> (...)
> > OTOH the package providing pytho
Mathias Behrle wrote...
> Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
(...)
> OTOH the package providing python-magic on PyPi[3] is provided by another
> Upstream[4].
... and I assume the APIs are not identical?
> The cleanest solution for me would look like
> - pac
On September 4, 2017 11:42:56 AM EDT, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
>Hi Christoph, hi folks,
>
>there exists an odd namespace conflict for python-magic.
>
>Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package
>'file'[0].
>According to the included s
Hi Christoph, hi folks,
there exists an odd namespace conflict for python-magic.
Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0].
According to the included setup.py the package for the python bindings are
published as 'file-magic'[1] and are availabl
28 matches
Mail list logo
