On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
Debian is used as a development system for portable apps. Many developers
need to test their software works with Python 2.1.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:29:12PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > BTW, what is happening with python-central... is it becoming standard?
> > If so, the pythonX.X packages will need to use it.
>
> what is python-central?
An experim
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:52:33AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > I'm planning to make pytho
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> BTW, what is happening with python-central... is it becoming standard?
> If so, the pythonX.X packages will need to use it.
what is python-central?
--
gram
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > > next week (uplo
Mark Brown writes:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
>
> > I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of
> > Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python.
>
> Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packa
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
It would make the transition somewhat easier for NMUs, as you
would only have to update the dependencies.
Tschööö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
pgp3TDIVlrPB5.p
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> can be found at
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/pyth
> I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> can be found at
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
>
> Please send packaging problems with the packages
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> can be found at
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/pyth
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
Please send packaging problems with the packages to debian-python.
When prep
14 matches
Mail list logo
