Re: #930780 ITS: pssh

2020-05-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 04.04.2020 um 09:46 teilte Jochen Sprickerhof mit: Hi Jochen, Sorry, late response! >>> * update to the latest upstream release (check #891340 or even >>> https://github.com/ParallelSSH/parallel-ssh ?) >>> >> Yes one has to do that. > > parallel-ssh seems to be a Python library and different

Re: ITS: pssh

2020-04-04 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Hilmar, * Hilmar Preuße [2020-03-14 08:26]: Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit: On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: * bring it under PAPT maintenance Is there more to do than creating a source package, adding a new package below the PAPT group and import the sour

Re: ITS: pssh

2020-03-14 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Sandro, I've lost interest in pssh. At that time I was investigating a couple of parallel SSH solutions, and I eventually chose ansible. On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 08:29:04PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: > > Source: pssh > > Version: 2.3.1-1 > > >

Re: ITS: pssh

2020-03-14 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: >> I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340 > > Not sure if Mo is still interested in salvaging this package, other > w

Re: ITS: pssh

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: > Source: pssh > Version: 2.3.1-1 > > I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340 Not sure if Mo is still interested in salvaging this package, other wise this could be a ni