Martin Schulze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have requested to remove Grail from slink since it doesn't seem
> to work for everybody and the new version is still non-free.
Since nobody has stepped in to maintain grail I have not requested
its entire removal.
Regards,
Joey
--
Hi,
I have requested to remove Grail from slink since it doesn't seem
to work for everybody and the new version is still non-free.
As I said I'm not going to package up another non-free version of
Grail. I'm not happy about this since I found Grail an interesting
project which sh
Hi,
I've just uploaded grail into non-free.
I have worked on grail because I like the idea of writing a fully
fledged web browser in a scripting language (like Perl or Python.
Unfortunately the package is not free, according to the DFSG[1]. I
was about to skip the whole thing after I
On Thu, Sep 17, 1998 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Lorenzo M. Catucci wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Gregor Hoffleit [...]
> >
> > I wonder if we are the only ones reading this list. Is it possible to
> > see who is subscribed to the list ?
> >
> `An interested user', at least... BTW, I'm pondering
Hi,
I had a small chat with two of the Grail/CNRI developers and
decided that the License is DFSG free. I'm attaching it requesting
for comments. I'll upload the package later. If somebody wants to
maintain this package, please drop
"Gregor Hoffleit writes:
> I wonder if we are the only ones reading this list. Is it possible to
> see who is subscribed to the list ?
Well, I'm here... I'm maintaining a handful of python-related
packages, including two which I am the "upstream" developer of
(palmpython and palm-doctoolkit).
--
On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Gregor Hoffleit >
> > An interested user told me that CNRI/NIST decided to leave the code
> > alone, after having used it as a testbed for network research and
> > might lighten the license.
[...]
>
> I wonder if we are the only ones reading this list. Is it possible t
Martin Schulze writes:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I'd like to entirely cancel my last mail wrt grail. I saw it and
> > removed it entirely. The licence is just fucked up.
> >
> > [..]
> > this Agreement does not authorize Licensee to distrib
Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd like to entirely cancel my last mail wrt grail. I saw it and
> removed it entirely. The licence is just fucked up.
>
> [..]
> this Agreement does not authorize Licensee to distribute copies of
> the Software to the public, per
I'd like to entirely cancel my last mail wrt grail. I saw it and
removed it entirely. The licence is just fucked up.
[..]
this Agreement does not authorize Licensee to distribute copies of
the Software to the public, perform and/or display the Software
publicly, or othe
I wonder if somebody is working on packaging Grail.
Regards,
Joey
--
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
11 matches
Mail list logo
