On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> m??n 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson:
[...]
> > > I can't think of a reason why you'd want the default package (as far
> > > as I can see they are useless, since you have to rebuild your
> > > packages every time a new
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> m??n 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson:
> > > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation
> > > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy
> > > document is pretty unrea
mÃn 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson:
> > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation
> > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy
> > document is pretty unreadable in this section and needs to be fixed.
> > If you have issues with
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:48:46PM +1000, Peter Hawkins wrote:
> Hi...
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 02:31 pm, you wrote:
> > the python-biggles source package should produce a python-biggles
> > binary package that depends on python2.2-biggles. this would be in
> > addition to python2.[12]-biggles.
4 matches
Mail list logo