Re: Fwd: python-biggles bug

2002-09-29 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > m??n 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson: [...] > > > I can't think of a reason why you'd want the default package (as far > > > as I can see they are useless, since you have to rebuild your > > > packages every time a new

Re: Fwd: python-biggles bug

2002-09-25 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > m??n 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson: > > > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation > > > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy > > > document is pretty unrea

Re: Fwd: python-biggles bug

2002-09-23 Thread Martin Sjögren
mÃn 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson: > > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation > > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy > > document is pretty unreadable in this section and needs to be fixed. > > If you have issues with

Fwd: python-biggles bug

2002-09-23 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:48:46PM +1000, Peter Hawkins wrote: > Hi... > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 02:31 pm, you wrote: > > the python-biggles source package should produce a python-biggles > > binary package that depends on python2.2-biggles. this would be in > > addition to python2.[12]-biggles.