On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
>Cool. Thanks everyone for your help. I'm going to ask upstream if
>they'll consider moving to oauthlib then instead of python-oauth2.
Thanks for that. I've ported a number of libraries and apps to oauthlib, and
had a chance to speak with th
On 10/02/14 05:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 02:41 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> [...]
>
> python-oauth2 is indeed not maintained anymore upstream, and has
> security problems. As a consequence, I worked out a patch for keystone
> so that it uses oauthlib instead. I would recommend th
On 02/10/2014 02:41 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am attempting to get a package into Debian. I have it packaged and
> accepted into unstable but due to a dependency on python-oauth2 it has
> been held back from entering testing.
>
> https://security-tracker.debi
Hello Iain,
On Sunday 09 February 2014 18:41:10 Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> If there is no effort to fix these bugs, could someone recommend an
> alternative package to depend on to provide OAuth2 client functionality
> for a Python module?
You could try python-oauthlib. Upstream is very active an
Hi,
I am attempting to get a package into Debian. I have it packaged and
accepted into unstable but due to a dependency on python-oauth2 it has
been held back from entering testing.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/python-oauth2
There are two open security problems
5 matches
Mail list logo
