Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:04:21PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 04:43:29PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > >> Has anyone built Python 2.1 alpha 2? > > > > Yes. > > Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the SF bug page so I figured > it was just me. > >

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:04:21PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > ucnhash.c too? Both are in Setup.dist, commented out. Yup. Fredirik Lundh did some cool work to prune down the unicode database even more. The original module some something like 2MB. Its down to about 200kB now. > The package bui

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Rick Younie
Neil Schemenauer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 04:43:29PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: >> Has anyone built Python 2.1 alpha 2? > > Yes. Yeah, I couldn't find anything on the SF bug page so I figured it was just me. >> It appears that unicodedatabase.c is missing. > > That file has been dead for

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 04:43:29PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > Has anyone built Python 2.1 alpha 2? Yes. > It appears that unicodedatabase.c is missing. That file has been dead for a while. Perhaps your Modules/Setup file is out of date. Neil

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Rick Younie
This probably better belongs on python-list.. Has anyone built Python 2.1 alpha 2? I'd like to stow it and check out the new features. The build fails when unicodedata is enabled. It appears that unicodedatabase.c is missing. Rick --

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:24:23AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > none; both packages should depend on python|python2 > > I am just waiting till python2 packages stabilise to upload > > versions with correct dependencies. > > But, of course, the correct way would be to have > > virtual

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > none; both packages should depend on python|python2 > I am just waiting till python2 packages stabilise to upload > versions with correct dependencies. > But, of course, the correct way would be to have > virtual package python, provided by python1-base and python2-base > it is my understand

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-05 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Moshe Zadka wrote: > Pycmail depends: on python, python-base, while > grc depends on python > > Which is correct? > none; both packages should depend on python|python2 I am just waiting till python2 packages stabilise to upload versions with correct depe

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-04 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Andreas Voegele wrote: > Moshe Zadka writes: > > > Pycmail depends: on python, python-base, while > > grc depends on python > > > > Which is correct? > > python (>> 2.0), in order to make sure that ">>" is used wherever > possible ;-) Might want to doub

Re: Dependencies on Python

2001-02-04 Thread Andreas Voegele
Moshe Zadka writes: > Pycmail depends: on python, python-base, while > grc depends on python > > Which is correct? python (>> 2.0), in order to make sure that ">>" is used wherever possible ;-)

Dependencies on Python

2001-02-02 Thread Moshe Zadka
Pycmail depends: on python, python-base, while grc depends on python Which is correct? -- Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This is a signature anti-virus. Please stop the spread of signature viruses! Fingerprint: 4BD1 7705 EEC0 260A 7F21 4817 C7FC A636 46D0 1BD6