On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 08:49:06AM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2022.08.14_07:41:26_+)
> > I don't know how many packages in Debian would be broken by the move
> > to 3.0.0; that may be something worth exploring. It may well be that
> > approach (2) makes most sense for the short
Hi Julian (2022.08.14_07:41:26_+)
> I don't know how many packages in Debian would be broken by the move
> to 3.0.0; that may be something worth exploring. It may well be that
> approach (2) makes most sense for the short term.
I think that's the first question to answer. Once we know how bad
t it needs cython 3.0.0alpha7 or later to be able to compile.
There is talk of moving cython 3.0.0 into beta in the not-too-distant
future: https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/4022 It does have
some breaking changes in comparison to cython 0.29.x.
I wonder what our strategy should be? Here
3 matches
Mail list logo
