: debian-python@lists.debian.org
The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only
look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they
aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading
to false positives.
Scott K
I contemplated filing a si
-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only
look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they
aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading
to false positives.
Scott K
I contemplated filing a similar the other day but in writing it up, I
rea
; > The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only
> > look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they
> > aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading
> > to false positives.
> >
> > Scott K
>
x27;t needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading
to false positives.
Scott K
I contemplated filing a similar the other day but in writing it up, I
realised that lintian was correct. Policy requires that the 'clean'
target be functional with only the Build-Dep
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only
look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they
aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-
[anatoly techtonik, 2010-12-17]
> Can anybody apply this patch to trac-bitten? Seems like everybody who
> could do this are busy.
done, thanks
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint:
Hi,
Can anybody apply this patch to trac-bitten? Seems like everybody who
could do this are busy.
Thanks.
--
anatoly t.
-- Forwarded message --
From: anatoly techtonik
Date: Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Build-Depends-Indep dependencies
To: Bernd Zeimetz
Hi
On 11/29/2010 12:27 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Of course you are still welcome to update packages, please send the according
>> patches to me and I'll apply them.
>
> Please apply the patch in attach.
attachment missing.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Develo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Even though the policy doesn't explain what Build-Depends-Indep is, it
>> says that Build-Depends-Indep should be present for these Makefile
>> targets:
>> build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep
>>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Even though the policy doesn't explain what Build-Depends-Indep is, it
>> says that Build-Depends-Indep should be present for these Makefile
>> targets:
>> build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep
>>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>> Of course you are still welcome to update packages, please send the
>>> according
>>> patches to me and I'll apply them.
Ok. I can send you patch right away, but I failed to understand what
Build-Depend
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
> > Cool. Why Python Application Team list is not there?
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-apps-team
>
> lists.alioth.debian.org is separate
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tristan Seligmann
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik
>> wrote:
>>> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
>>
>> FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/sear
asked was quite complicated concept nobody
> was able to explain so far, and I still expect some on-topic ideas
> from this discussion.
>
> If you are fighting for justice then make an exam to test the
> knowledge of Build-Depends-Indep and revoke access for everybody who
> don't
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/search.html
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
uld contain build-indep target for
> ^^
>
>> Build-Depends-Indep, and there is no such rule in trac-bitten.
>
> Yes. "Should" is not "must".
Ok, but then Build-Depends-Indep doesn't make sense without
build-indep target. Why it is present in d
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tristan Seligmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> many places outdated (email-based bug-trackers, ML without search,
>
> FWIW: http://lists.debian.org/search.html
Cool. Why Python Application Team list is not there?
http:/
anatoly techtonik wrote:
> I know basics about Makefiles - I know that target is and what 4-space
> indents from PEP-8 are unwelcome there. But Debian Policy tells that
> debian/rules should contain build-indep target for
^^
> Build-Depends-Indep, and there is no
u are fighting for justice then make an exam to test the
knowledge of Build-Depends-Indep and revoke access for everybody who
don't understand this. I am willing to elaborate on questionnaire
form. =)
I know basics about Makefiles - I know that target is and what 4-space
indents from PEP-8 are
al
months ago, but I didn't need to understand Build-Depends-Indep and
rereading this stuff from scratch is kind of ineffective in the end.
So, the idea of the previous paragraph is that there should be another
entrypoint that explains meaning to people, who primarily use Python
rather t
ult won't be
>>> able to help you in maintaining.
>>
>> ahah nice try - f.e. why would you need to "educate" yourself about
>> autotools? it's a non sequitur from b-d vs b-d-i question: care to
>> explain?
>
> Because from Debian Policy I und
gate
to making correct Debian packages.
Section
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#control
will enlighten you about Build-Depends-Indep use.
Roughly, one way to figure out if you need to specify something in
that field is to ask yourself these questions in order :
1. Is my
etween Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
>>>> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
>>>
>>> look it up on Debian Policy - and questions like this should be sent
>>> to debian-mentors: there's nothing python sp
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:16, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
>>> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
>>> manu
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
>> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
>> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
>
>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 09:34, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
> difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
> manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
look it up on Debia
Sorry for the lame question, but I couldn't find an explanation of
difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in Debian
manuals. Can anybody explain when Build-Depends-Indep is required?
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On 07-Nov-2001 Danie Roux wrote:
> Policy states that you should Build-Depends on python2.1-dev.
>
> Can this also be Build-Depends-Indep? I have a "Architecture: all"
> package. It's just 3 python files. No need for "Architecture: any"
>
of course it c
Policy states that you should Build-Depends on python2.1-dev.
Can this also be Build-Depends-Indep? I have a "Architecture: all"
package. It's just 3 python files. No need for "Architecture: any"
--
Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix
29 matches
Mail list logo
