Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2024-10-23 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Guillem (2024.10.18_13:31:26_+) > > IMO source package names should follow upstream as closely as possible > > If Debian only contained python packages, that would make sense, > because python modules upstream need to care about not stomping over > each others names. But Debian contains sou

Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2024-10-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.10.24 18:48, Scott Kitterman wrote: On October 18, 2024 2:07:35 PM UTC, Simon McVittie wrote: On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 15:31:26 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: I guess whether "upstream name or python-$modulename" would seem fine, depends on what "upstream name" is. I guess if the latter is

Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2024-10-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On October 18, 2024 2:07:35 PM UTC, Simon McVittie wrote: >On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 15:31:26 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: >> I guess whether "upstream name or python-$modulename" would seem fine, >> depends on what "upstream name" is. I guess if the latter is something >> like "py" or some widely

Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2024-10-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 15:31:26 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > I guess whether "upstream name or python-$modulename" would seem fine, > depends on what "upstream name" is. I guess if the latter is something > like "py" or some widely known sub-ecosystem that is > really very much python-specific, an

Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2024-10-18 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! [ I never received a reply so was not aware some conversation had been going on. :) I've rearranged the replies a bit. ] On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 13:52:09 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > tags 791635 + wontfix > thanks > [Scott Kitterman, 2023-01-29] > > Please wontfix and let's move on. > >

Re: Bug#791635 python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2023-02-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Scott (2023.01.29_01:34:54_+) > It'd be much simpler just to drop DPT or myself from uploaders and ignore > this, so that's probably the path I would take. The Debian Python Policy is independent of DPT. So, if adopted, that wouldn't help much... :) > Regardless, I don't think this is an

Re: Bug#791635 python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2023-01-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
Do we really have to have this argument again? Let's not. Please wontfix and let's move on. Personally, I maintain 25 packages in the team that would need renaming. I'm not sure how many total there are, but they'd all have to go through New again. It'd be much simpler just to drop DPT or my

Re: Bug#791635 python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module packages

2023-01-28 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reopen -1 Control: reassign -1 python3 [ Sorry, resending, as the bug was archived so it ignored all the control commands. ] This got closed due to the python-defaults package being removed from sid, reopening and reassigning where python-policy seems to be located now. On Tue, 2022-1