Re: Bug#118916: wajig: should depend on python, not python-base

2001-11-11 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 06:40:22AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Matthias> So either build-depend on python (>= 2.1), > Matthias> python (<< 2.2) or use `python2.1'. > I still don't get it. What is the difference? python2.1 vs python2.1? "python (>= 2.1)" ensures /usr/bin/python is python

Re: Bug#118916: wajig: should depend on python, not python-base

2001-11-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
"Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * Adapted Python Policy (as of version 0.3.7) * debian/control: Depends >> python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2) (Closes: #118916) * debian/control: >> Added Build-Depends on python2.1-dev (Closes: #19009) >> >> -- Dirk Eddelbuett

Re: Bug#118916: wajig: should depend on python, not python-base

2001-11-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben> Package: wajig Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-09 Severity: serious > Ben> > Ben> Hi. Package wajig cannot be installed because it depends on the > Ben> non-existant "python-base". Python packages hav

Bug#118916: wajig: should depend on python, not python-base

2001-11-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
"Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> Package: wajig Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-09 Severity: serious Ben> Ben> Hi. Package wajig cannot be installed because it depends on the Ben> non-existant "python-base". Python packages have recently been Ben> changed accordi