Re: Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:23:50PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2025-01-19 14:44, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > You can achieve that with: > > PY3VERS=$(PY3DEF) > > +PY3RANGE=$(shell echo $(PY3DEF) | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." }; { print $$1 > > "." $$2 "-" $$1 "." $$2 + 1 }') > > > > + dh_python3 -

Re: Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

On 2025-01-19 14:44, Colin Watson wrote: You can achieve that with: PY3VERS=$(PY3DEF) +PY3RANGE=$(shell echo $(PY3DEF) | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." }; { print $$1 "." $$2 "-" $$1 "." $$2 + 1 }') + dh_python3 -V $(PY3RANGE) --no-ext-rename # Hack: Do not rename libraries from e.g. vtkClientServerPy

Re: Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 07:09:57PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > I'd be interested too to know if there's an existing mechanism for > this situation. paraview can't be the only package with python > extensions that can only be built for the default python. > > I'd say we'd want > Depends: python3

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

Package: paraview Version: 5.13.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 python3-paraview https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/paraview Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for paraview/5.13.2+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference