Re: Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x

2023-09-24 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to package it as python3-pydantic2 directly? To avoid > breaking every software that uses it. > > In that way they could just coexist and packages depending on the old one > wouldn't all suddenly break. We d

Re: Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x

2023-09-24 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Wouldn't it be better to package it as python3-pydantic2 directly? To avoid breaking every software that uses it. In that way they could just coexist and packages depending on the old one wouldn't all suddenly break. Best -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso

Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x

2023-09-16 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: pydantic Version: 1.10.4-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, I would like to have pydantic updated to the latest 2.x major release, because rstcheck depends on it. The 2.x API has some breakin