Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-20 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le lundi 20 août 2018 à 16:20:54+0200, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > On 08/15/2018 03:11 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > >> Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > >>> 2. What's the proper way to h

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/15/2018 03:11 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : >> Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: >>> 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? >> >> Build profiles? You can annotate the build-de

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 15:47:36 +0200, a ecrit: > So I found a way to build locally, using your suggestions. In my case I > guess I could upload directly the output of the nocheck build as the bin > package isn't altered. Yes, but better request a binnmu after the uploa

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 15:11:25+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit : > Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > > > Build profiles? Yo

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with > so that one can easily (re)bo

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, 12:11 Samuel Thibault, wrote: > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with > so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circ

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circle at any time by using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck dpkg-buildpa

Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Hi, I was asked a long time ago to make a pypy package for nose2[1]. I realized while considering this bug that I'd require to have a pypy package for mock first. mock build-depends on unittest2 and pbr that are not pypy-packaged either. pbr is maintained in the OpenStack Team, but zigo is eager