On 7 May 2013 18:46, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare
> thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just
> a bunch of puppets waiting for orders by the ultimate master - well
> done.
>
Selectively quoting the tech com
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/05/msg5.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/05/msg00020.html
debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare
thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just
a bunch of puppets waiting for o
* Steve Langasek , 2013-05-06, 14:52:
Unless this upload has materially impacted your packages due to a lack
of coordination - and I don't see how it could, given that this is an
obvious change to make, and can't possibly have interfered with other
transitions given that it comes at the beginni
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:15:42PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> The lack of discussion, as mandated by TC.
The resolution refers to the "interpreter packages". The python
metapackages were already under team maintenance at the time of this
resolution and were out of scope for the decision. While
The lack of discussion, as mandated by TC.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Do you object to the dropping of 2.6 or just the lack of discussion before it
> was done?
>
> Scott K
>
> On Monday, May 06, 2013 09:29:11 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> has this been discussed
Do you object to the dropping of 2.6 or just the lack of discussion before it
was done?
Scott K
On Monday, May 06, 2013 09:29:11 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail
> for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian p
On May 06, 2013, at 03:13 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>Python2.6 security support ends in October 2013 upstream. Which is
>well ahead of jessie freeze & release. From security point of view
>alone, it would be unwise to ship python2.6 in jessie. Which imho is
>serious enough reason to remove pytho
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs [2013-05-06 03:13:47 -0700]:
> On 6 May 2013 00:29, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail
> > for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian python
> > board" nor the ACK from RT.
> >
>
> Python2.
On 6 May 2013 00:29, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail
> for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian python
> board" nor the ACK from RT.
>
Python2.6 security support ends in October 2013 upstream. Which is
well ah
Hello,
has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail
for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian python
board" nor the ACK from RT.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.8
> Da
10 matches
Mail list logo
